Page 4 of 7
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:52 pm
by mooner
I don't see what you guys and all the brewers are all bent out of shape about. Don't you know 4 out of 5 Ontarians approve of this benevolent offer?
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/2429680
"This is not a lukewarm response. This is clearly a very popular proposal with Ontarians," said Pollara Executive Vice-President Craig Worden. "Based on the announcement, the public is strongly supportive and sees it benefiting craft brewers, the industry as a whole, and themselves as beer consumers."
See? Well I guess that's settled.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:57 am
by atomeyes
now we know why The Beer Store's announcement was timed accordingly.
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/ ... store.html
While Ontario Craft Brewers, the association representing 50 of the smaller producers, has officially panned the offer, at least a dozen microbreweries have already expressed interest in buying in.
i wonder which breweries actually expressed legitimate interest?
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 8:32 am
by MatttthewGeorge
atomeyes wrote:now we know why The Beer Store's announcement was timed accordingly.
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/ ... store.html
While Ontario Craft Brewers, the association representing 50 of the smaller producers, has officially panned the offer, at least a dozen microbreweries have already expressed interest in buying in.
i wonder which breweries actually expressed legitimate interest?
Let's attack them with pitchforks and shovels lol
I'm not saying that's what you're saying, but it doesn't take long to find some that are, (ie twitter).
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:20 am
by Craig
I can understand the appeal to many micros that really only have a couple of beers in their core lineup. Like, oh, I dunno, Hockley or St. Andre? Plus maybe a bunch of brewpubs if they could figure out how to get their stuff in cans/bottles TBS can sell. I'm assuming they don't want to deal with growlers.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:29 am
by atomeyes
Craig wrote:I can understand the appeal to many micros that really only have a couple of beers in their core lineup. Like, oh, I dunno, Hockley or St. Andre? Plus maybe a bunch of brewpubs if they could figure out how to get their stuff in cans/bottles TBS can sell. I'm assuming they don't want to deal with growlers.
if you own a brewpub, you don't want to re-direct people to the Beer Store. you'd rather they drink your draught and then take bottles home vs never visit your place.
i get what you're saying, but, overall, i think the "5 local stores" rule does a brewpub more harm than good.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:39 am
by Craig
atomeyes wrote:Craig wrote:I can understand the appeal to many micros that really only have a couple of beers in their core lineup. Like, oh, I dunno, Hockley or St. Andre? Plus maybe a bunch of brewpubs if they could figure out how to get their stuff in cans/bottles TBS can sell. I'm assuming they don't want to deal with growlers.
if you own a brewpub, you don't want to re-direct people to the Beer Store. you'd rather they drink your draught and then take bottles home vs never visit your place.
i get what you're saying, but, overall, i think the "5 local stores" rule does a brewpub more harm than good.
Or you think if people try your beer in TBS they might think "hey, maybe I should check out the pub?" Plus they're getting to list their beer for free, so they're just pocketing money from any sale they make.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:56 am
by Cass
Craig wrote:I can understand the appeal to many micros that really only have a couple of beers in their core lineup. Like, oh, I dunno, Hockley or St. Andre? Plus maybe a bunch of brewpubs if they could figure out how to get their stuff in cans/bottles TBS can sell. I'm assuming they don't want to deal with growlers.
Actual brewpubs can't package their beer for sale, nor do off sales AFAIK. The "brewpubs" that we know that sell beer (Granite, Indie) are actually legal breweries with tied houses.
Brewpubs still can't exceed 6.5% alc/vol for their beer, another ridiculously archaic law that's still on the books. The crazy laws are why (IMO) we see so few actual brewpubs in the marketplace anymore.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:10 am
by Kel Varnsen
midlife crisis wrote:
Well, exactly, that is the fallacy in TBS's proposal. They are only offering the five closest stores to the brewery, not all "local" stores. So why not just drive the extra five minutes to the brewery then? Though two caveats I guess: for a rural brewer, say Whitewater, the five closest stores will have a considerable geographic spread. Secondly, brewery outlets are not currently allowed to sell beers contract-brewed at their location, if I understand things correctly. So if contract brewers are included in TBS's proposal, it might actually have some slight benefit.
Except that is looking at it from a beer geeks point of view. There are a lot of beer drinkers out there who would never even think of going to a brewery to get beer, even if it is only a 5 minute drive away. But a small percentage of them might try something new, if they see it at the store they go to every week.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:58 am
by FEUO
MatttthewGeorge wrote:atomeyes wrote:now we know why The Beer Store's announcement was timed accordingly.
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/ ... store.html
While Ontario Craft Brewers, the association representing 50 of the smaller producers, has officially panned the offer, at least a dozen microbreweries have already expressed interest in buying in.
i wonder which breweries actually expressed legitimate interest?
Let's attack them with pitchforks and shovels lol
I'm not saying that's what you're saying, but it doesn't take long to find some that are, (ie twitter).
I don't have time.
Who?
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:10 pm
by TheSevenDuffs
FEUO wrote:
I don't have time.
Who?
My guess would be that Mill Street would be all over this.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:11 pm
by Masterplan
I'd imagine the breweries located in northern Ontario love it. Does Sudbury even have 5 beer stores? Turns out they do, but the Sault and North Bay do not.
Meaning they can cover their entire communities with this deal.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:08 pm
by midlife crisis
The whole point of this brilliantly evil plan by TBS is to divide and conquer. I expect it will work.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 2:58 pm
by Cass
midlife crisis wrote:The whole point of this brilliantly evil plan by TBS is to divide and conquer. I expect it will work.
If they really wanted to divide the market they would allow 5 free listings to importers. So many import brands get turned down from the LCBO nowadays, there would certainly be importers who would do it.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:13 pm
by Craig
Cass wrote:midlife crisis wrote:The whole point of this brilliantly evil plan by TBS is to divide and conquer. I expect it will work.
If they really wanted to divide the market they would allow 5 free listings to importers. So many import brands get turned down from the LCBO nowadays, there would certainly be importers who would do it.
That doesn't win the PR battle though. They need to look like they're a) Canadian and b) helping the little guy.
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:22 pm
by Cass
Craig wrote:Cass wrote:midlife crisis wrote:The whole point of this brilliantly evil plan by TBS is to divide and conquer. I expect it will work.
If they really wanted to divide the market they would allow 5 free listings to importers. So many import brands get turned down from the LCBO nowadays, there would certainly be importers who would do it.
That doesn't win the PR battle though. They need to look like they're a) Canadian and b) helping the little guy.
Oh for sure. But what it would do is help the "we're the best selection in the world" garbage.