Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.

We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.

Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!

New Arrivals at LCBO & TBS

This forum is for discussing everything beer retail: LCBO, Beer Store, Grocery Stores and Indie Stores.

Moderators: Craig, Cass

User avatar
beerguykw
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:37 pm

Post by beerguykw »

for those that have had the SNPA and Goose Island, which would you say is better?

napoleon
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:37 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by napoleon »

Masterplan wrote:Is it me, or is SN PA not worth the bother? I've had it numerous times in the US and never come away impressed. Maybe 5-10 years ago it would have been something, but now with GLB, muskoka and others pushing the IPA limit, it always struck me as a pedestrian beer...?
I'm normally the first to defend California beer, but this is now basically fairly mass market. Sierra Nevada still does some lovely beers, but this is brewed at quite large scale these days and isn't anything special. I quite like the local Pales and IPA's. Nice to see the sessionable IPA additions as well, like the Detour at the LCBO.

AugustusRex
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 2:13 pm

Post by AugustusRex »

napoleon wrote:
Masterplan wrote:Is it me, or is SN PA not worth the bother? I've had it numerous times in the US and never come away impressed. Maybe 5-10 years ago it would have been something, but now with GLB, muskoka and others pushing the IPA limit, it always struck me as a pedestrian beer...?
I'm normally the first to defend California beer, but this is now basically fairly mass market. Sierra Nevada still does some lovely beers, but this is brewed at quite large scale these days and isn't anything special. I quite like the local Pales and IPA's. Nice to see the sessionable IPA additions as well, like the Detour at the LCBO.
Just like to point out that a lot of great beers are mass produced: Weihenstepaner, Duvel, Rodenbach, Chimay, Fullers etc. It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it, is what I heard.

User avatar
Belgian
Bar Towel Legend
Posts: 10033
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Belgian »

AugustusRex wrote:[...Just like to point out that a lot of great beers are mass produced: Weihenstepaner, Duvel, Rodenbach, Chimay, Fullers etc. It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it, is what I heard.
This. And freshness. We could surmise that a scaled-up craft brewer will have better access to consistent ingredients that are turned over quickly, and also have a better distribution network. What goes into the bottle and what arrives to you has a very reliable chance of being fresh and consistent. Conversely if the hops are a 'make do' batch for a smaller brewer and/or if the LCBO decides to lose it in a warehouse 60 days or so, that's very tough on an IPA that might otherwise have been amazing.

This is another reason I expect Stone IPA to do well here, not because it's necessarily better than all beers made or sold here but because I'm hoping it will arrive to you in pristine form and tasting exactly like every batch, if they have their act together and take the market seriously. For a beer like that it is a good thing.

* edit * maybe I'm over-extending the idea of Goose IPA being brewed here and sold directly via the Beer Store. A little different scenario, but an interesting one.
In Beerum Veritas

ercousin
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by ercousin »

AugustusRex wrote:
napoleon wrote:
Masterplan wrote:Is it me, or is SN PA not worth the bother? I've had it numerous times in the US and never come away impressed. Maybe 5-10 years ago it would have been something, but now with GLB, muskoka and others pushing the IPA limit, it always struck me as a pedestrian beer...?
I'm normally the first to defend California beer, but this is now basically fairly mass market. Sierra Nevada still does some lovely beers, but this is brewed at quite large scale these days and isn't anything special. I quite like the local Pales and IPA's. Nice to see the sessionable IPA additions as well, like the Detour at the LCBO.
Just like to point out that a lot of great beers are mass produced: Weihenstepaner, Duvel, Rodenbach, Chimay, Fullers etc. It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it, is what I heard.
+1 Just because a brewery is big doesn't mean they make undesirable beer. In my experience the bigger the brewery the more consistent their product is and free of off flavours, there are exceptions to that of course. I'm also the last guy to bash Budweiser or Coors for the quality of their beer, it's their business practices I'm not a fan of. They have distribution and serving problems like anyone else, if I have a bad BMC beer I think it's usually because of poor line cleaning (*cough*Wild Wing) or old stock.

One of their brewing scientists has done a few AMAs on reddit 2 years ago (and another 7 months ago). After reading them I had a new-found appreciation of their technical prowess. https://www.reddit.com/user/ABInBevAMA/submitted/
GTA Brews - Toronto's Homebrew Club - http://www.gtabrews.ca/

Eric's Brewing Blog - Advanced Homebrewing for the Intermediate Brewer - http://www.ericbrews.com/

User avatar
Belgian
Bar Towel Legend
Posts: 10033
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Belgian »

^ I wish there were legitimate audits and oversights of many things, such as bank and insurance company fee charging practices, and anti-competitive brewery tactics to manipulate bars to exclude smaller brewers.

Like many things, there's no money in it for the goberment so they don't care about the public's interest or the little guy. It's pay to play & Ontario is for sale to the big corporate whores!
In Beerum Veritas

icemachine
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2637
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Aurora, ON
Contact:

Post by icemachine »

Belgian wrote:^ I wish there were legitimate audits and oversights of many things, such as bank and insurance company fee charging practices, and anti-competitive brewery tactics to manipulate bars to exclude smaller brewers.

Like many things, there's no money in it for the goberment so they don't care about the public's interest or the little guy. It's pay to play & Ontario is for sale to the big corporate whores!
People and business complain about Nanny State government enough as it is. You get them inspecting tap lines and the CFIB would go ballistic
"Everything ... is happening" - Bob Cole

User avatar
darmokandjalad
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:04 pm
Location: Ridgetown, ON

Post by darmokandjalad »

beerguykw wrote:for those that have had the SNPA and Goose Island, which would you say is better?
It's extremely close. They are both solid pale ales that would be perfectly acceptable for everyday swiggin' purposes. I liked SNPA marginally more, but Goose IPA is cheaper so I'm more likely to go for that one again.

User avatar
beerguykw
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:37 pm

Post by beerguykw »

darmokandjalad wrote:
beerguykw wrote:for those that have had the SNPA and Goose Island, which would you say is better?
It's extremely close. They are both solid pale ales that would be perfectly acceptable for everyday swiggin' purposes. I liked SNPA marginally more, but Goose IPA is cheaper so I'm more likely to go for that one again.
Finally,. someone answered my question! Thanks. Which would you say has the more bitter hop profile? I didn't find the SN had any bitterness at all.

User avatar
Kish84
Bar Fly
Posts: 602
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: Kitchener

Post by Kish84 »

beerguykw wrote:
darmokandjalad wrote:
beerguykw wrote:for those that have had the SNPA and Goose Island, which would you say is better?
It's extremely close. They are both solid pale ales that would be perfectly acceptable for everyday swiggin' purposes. I liked SNPA marginally more, but Goose IPA is cheaper so I'm more likely to go for that one again.
Finally,. someone answered my question! Thanks. Which would you say has the more bitter hop profile? I didn't find the SN had any bitterness at all.
Just buy some fresh Headstock or Naughty Neighbour and call it a day. I bought some Headstock 2 weeks ago that was 2 days old, fucking fantastic.
"There's always money in the banana stand."

User avatar
beerguykw
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:37 pm

Post by beerguykw »

I've already got both in the fridge for the weekend. Along with some Pompus Ass, Canuck, Red Racer, and a few other randoms.

Jay-Brew
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:55 pm

Post by Jay-Brew »

I have had SNPA several times in the States (or have brought back home) and once recently on tap here and wouldn't mind getting some to revisit it. I see that it's showing stock in all sorts of places, so I called the downtown Kingston store to ask if they had any given that stock wasn't showing. Based on when they typically get stuff in I thought it was odd it wasn't here by now. Was told they have none and aren't getting any in. I asked why and was told that it's probably because they have too many beer SKUs. She gave me the product number and said I could call the other stores here. Based on what each of the stores get, I would be very surprised if any of them get it. The downtown store typically gets most of the releases so I am not trying to complain, but I find the LCBO extremely frustrating some days. They have all sorts of beer that sits on the shelves forever, which apparently prevents them from bringing something in that will actually sell. They are many examples. They totally screwed it up with Heelch O' Hops, which is probably a respectable beer, but it's hard to know when LCBO introduced it to stores when it was three months old. The list goes on.

Lukie
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:16 am

Post by Lukie »

Finally,. someone answered my question! Thanks. Which would you say has the more bitter hop profile? I didn't find the SN had any bitterness at all.[/quote]
Just buy some fresh Headstock or Naughty Neighbour and call it a day. I bought some Headstock 2 weeks ago that was 2 days old, fucking fantastic.[/quote]


I concur. A fresh Headstock is divine, my number 1 IPA ever since Red Racer has gone to the dogs. But even Headstock got old very fast, for weeks now its already fading from its glory

User avatar
Craig
Seasoned Drinker
Posts: 1946
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:23 am

Post by Craig »

beerguykw wrote:
darmokandjalad wrote:
beerguykw wrote:for those that have had the SNPA and Goose Island, which would you say is better?
It's extremely close. They are both solid pale ales that would be perfectly acceptable for everyday swiggin' purposes. I liked SNPA marginally more, but Goose IPA is cheaper so I'm more likely to go for that one again.
Finally,. someone answered my question! Thanks. Which would you say has the more bitter hop profile? I didn't find the SN had any bitterness at all.
I haven't had a SNPA in ages, but my memory is that Goose is more bitter, where SNPA tends more to the aromatic side.

User avatar
beerguykw
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:37 pm

Post by beerguykw »

It's extremely close. They are both solid pale ales that would be perfectly acceptable for everyday swiggin' purposes. I liked SNPA marginally more, but Goose IPA is cheaper so I'm more likely to go for that one again.[/quote]


I haven't had a SNPA in ages, but my memory is that Goose is more bitter, where SNPA tends more to the aromatic side.[/quote]

I got around to trying the Goose this weekend and I agree, it is more on the hoppy side. I can say they were both worth a try, but I won't be going out of my way to get either of them any time soon.

Post Reply