Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.

We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.

Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!

New Arrivals at LCBO & TBS

This forum is for discussing everything beer retail: LCBO, Beer Store, Grocery Stores and Indie Stores.

Moderators: Craig, Cass

Ukie
Bar Fly
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Hamilton

Post by Ukie »

cratez wrote:
Ukie wrote: The expiry date is probably Sept 01 2015, if its all the same run.
Yeah I grabbed a couple bottles and the BB date is September 3rd. It's drinking fine right now (not as good as the fresh kegs we got in February) but I probably won't buy anymore after this week.

Got some today BB Sept 13, 2015, probably same as yours.

Ten extra days, woo hoo!

biegaman
Bar Fly
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: West Hill

Post by biegaman »

Ukie wrote:
cratez wrote:
Ukie wrote: The expiry date is probably Sept 01 2015, if its all the same run.
Yeah I grabbed a couple bottles and the BB date is September 3rd. It's drinking fine right now (not as good as the fresh kegs we got in February) but I probably won't buy anymore after this week.

Got some today BB Sept 13, 2015, probably same as yours.

Ten extra days, woo hoo!
Stone has given us the OK to extend the shelf life of the IPA from 90 days to 120 (same as Cali and Arrogant). Not sure how we're going to fix that on the bottles though...
Apparently this is something they've been testing in their quality control lab for a while and decided the deterioration isn't significant in those extra 30 days. (at 3 lbs of hops per barrel it's no wonder...)

Also, for what it's worth, this batch of bottles took three days to get to Toronto ...then it sat for 2 months in the warehouse. Stone is super adamant about freshness and was just in town to speak with them about this. One of the delays was that the palates were a half inch too short for board requirements. :roll:

User avatar
Belgian
Bar Towel Legend
Posts: 10033
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Belgian »

biegaman wrote:Also, for what it's worth, this batch of bottles took three days to get to Toronto ...then it sat for 2 months in the warehouse. Stone is super adamant about freshness and was just in town to speak with them about this. One of the delays was that the palates were a half inch too short for board requirements. :roll:
Pallets. Unless your beer sommelier was not up to Gene Simmons standards!
Image

Seriously though it's cool that Stone cared about us & extended the shelf life for this batch. Thanks for the feedback Biegs.
In Beerum Veritas

Ukie
Bar Fly
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Hamilton

Post by Ukie »

biegaman wrote:
Stone has given us the OK to extend the shelf life of the IPA from 90 days to 120 (same as Cali and Arrogant). Not sure how we're going to fix that on the bottles though...
Apparently this is something they've been testing in their quality control lab for a while and decided the deterioration isn't significant in those extra 30 days. (at 3 lbs of hops per barrel it's no wonder...)

Also, for what it's worth, this batch of bottles took three days to get to Toronto ...then it sat for 2 months in the warehouse. Stone is super adamant about freshness and was just in town to speak with them about this. One of the delays was that the palates were a half inch too short for board requirements. :roll:

I thought Arrogant was 90 days and only Cali was ever 120 days?

Jay-Brew
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 4:55 pm

Post by Jay-Brew »

I don't even know what to say about LCBO. I'd be pissed if I was Stone and the importer. There is no excuse to have this beer sitting in their warehouse for two months. Seems a bit strange that when the beer hits shelves with three weeks left to "enjoy by" that we're now getting an extra 30 days. Maybe they think their 90 day standard is a little too hardcore, and it will be interesting to see if they implement this extension permanently or if it's a means to avoid a bunch of "expired" beer sitting on LCBO shelves in three weeks.

User avatar
Craig
Seasoned Drinker
Posts: 1947
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:23 am

Post by Craig »

The whole lab testing thing is totally ridiculous. It's a standard that, to the best of my knowledge, isn't applied to any other food or drink products imported to Canada or Ontario at all. Can you imagine if the government decided that whenever someone wants to import a shipment of lettuce or ground beef to Ontario they have to undergo 2 months of lab testing? It's obviously ridiculous, especially when you consider that things like leafy greens and meat actually do have records of E. Coli and other nasty stuff living in them, unlike alcohol products. Even beyond the ridiculousness of it and how it gets in the way of quality product hitting the shelves, it's obviously not free to get that done and you have to know that consumers are the ones paying for it. Whether we're paying for it at retail or paying for it through a reduction in royalties going back to the province, either way the little guy pays for it.

BakaGaijin
Posts: 472
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:41 pm
Location: Burlington

Post by BakaGaijin »

I agree with this 100%. I would much rather prefer that these resources were spent testing food products from China.
Craig wrote:The whole lab testing thing is totally ridiculous. It's a standard that, to the best of my knowledge, isn't applied to any other food or drink products imported to Canada or Ontario at all. Can you imagine if the government decided that whenever someone wants to import a shipment of lettuce or ground beef to Ontario they have to undergo 2 months of lab testing? It's obviously ridiculous, especially when you consider that things like leafy greens and meat actually do have records of E. Coli and other nasty stuff living in them, unlike alcohol products. Even beyond the ridiculousness of it and how it gets in the way of quality product hitting the shelves, it's obviously not free to get that done and you have to know that consumers are the ones paying for it. Whether we're paying for it at retail or paying for it through a reduction in royalties going back to the province, either way the little guy pays for it.

User avatar
cratez
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:29 pm
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Contact:

Post by cratez »

Ukie wrote: Got some today BB Sept 13, 2015, probably same as yours. Ten extra days, woo hoo!
The "03" is crystal clear on my bottle so I find it strange that we have shipments that are only ten days apart. I wonder if there are other dates out there as well?
Jay-Brew wrote: I don't even know what to say about LCBO. I'd be pissed if I was Stone and the importer. There is no excuse to have this beer sitting in their warehouse for two months.
Craig wrote:The whole lab testing thing is totally ridiculous. It's a standard that, to the best of my knowledge, isn't applied to any other food or drink products imported to Canada or Ontario at all. Can you imagine if the government decided that whenever someone wants to import a shipment of lettuce or ground beef to Ontario they have to undergo 2 months of lab testing? It's obviously ridiculous, especially when you consider that things like leafy greens and meat actually do have records of E. Coli and other nasty stuff living in them, unlike alcohol products. Even beyond the ridiculousness of it and how it gets in the way of quality product hitting the shelves...
Couldn't agree more.
"Bar people do not live as long as vegan joggers. However, they have more fun." - Bruce Elliott

User avatar
spinrsx
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2267
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

Post by spinrsx »

I also don't get why brewers still date formats like "09/03/15"

Is that September? Is that March? Most of the time I just buy another beer and not take the chance.

Kel Varnsen
Bar Fly
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 9:25 am
Location: Ottawa

Post by Kel Varnsen »

spinrsx wrote:I also don't get why brewers still date formats like "09/03/15"

Is that September? Is that March? Most of the time I just buy another beer and not take the chance.
Ambiguous date formats always piss me off. Although at least the numbering is better than some stupid code with letters and a number representing the day of the year. But really how hard it it to print. BB Aug 21/15 or something like that?

Ukie
Bar Fly
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:56 pm
Location: Hamilton

Post by Ukie »

spinrsx wrote:I also don't get why brewers still date formats like "09/03/15"

Is that September? Is that March? Most of the time I just buy another beer and not take the chance.
I know you know but for newbies:

North America Month / Day / Year
Europe Day / Month / Year

Usually, unless they use the Julian code or some other weird combo.....Sometimes I compare several bottles hoping for a 2 digit over 12 date just to be sure

I still fall for the bilingual Cdn code on food BB/MA 16 MR 28

Best before May 16th WTF this is August! Oh right the French I get it now and again, March 28 2016.

Double checked the Bastard all bottles 09/13/15

User avatar
spinrsx
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2267
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

Post by spinrsx »

pink fuzz at the Ottawa LCBO's now

Image

User avatar
Belgian
Bar Towel Legend
Posts: 10033
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Belgian »

Kel Varnsen wrote:Ambiguous date formats always piss me off. Although at least the numbering is better than some stupid code with letters and a number representing the day of the year. But really how hard it it to print. BB Aug 21/15 or something like that?
They must figure it's better to piss off consumers than retailers, because date codes can seem intentionally arcane or hard to read. US retailers must not want to sort out the bad stock or even feel responsible for those who are stuck with stale crap they brought home.

Stone date codes are pretty clear though, FWIW. And pretty conservative by about an extra month. According to Stone. ;)
In Beerum Veritas

atomeyes
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2153
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:39 pm

Post by atomeyes »

biegaman wrote: Also, for what it's worth, this batch of bottles took three days to get to Toronto ...then it sat for 2 months in the warehouse. Stone is super adamant about freshness and was just in town to speak with them about this. One of the delays was that the palates were a half inch too short for board requirements. :roll:
from what i understand, there are Europe standardized palates and North American standardized palates.
i have never, ever heard of Ontario standardized palates. this makes no sense unless Stone just screwed up. but the size difference between Euro and NA palates is more than half an inch.

(more boring factoids: there also are palates with rounded corners. those can't be used in NA)

User avatar
S. St. Jeb
Seasoned Drinker
Posts: 1049
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:44 pm
Location: Burlington, ON

Post by S. St. Jeb »

Ukie wrote:
spinrsx wrote:I also don't get why brewers still date formats like "09/03/15"

Is that September? Is that March? Most of the time I just buy another beer and not take the chance.
I know you know but for newbies:

North America Month / Day / Year
Europe Day / Month / Year
Most people don't know, but the World and Canadian standard for all-numeric dates is yyyy-mm-dd (check your driver's license).

If all would use this, there would be no confusion.

Post Reply