BakaGaijin wrote:True....but the argument was that these releases don't make money....but they do.
...something like 40 000 bottles of Kentucky Bastard I think ($640 000 revenue).
Masterplan wrote:There is no distro fee.
BakaGaijin wrote:True....but the argument was that these releases don't make money....but they do.
Bellwoods does a ton of such releases a year and Nickel Brook did something like 40 000 bottles of Kentucky Bastard I think ($640 000 revenue).
There is no reason why Amsterdam can't do these barrel aged beers and do it at a profit IMO. I think the original question was why don't they do them anymore. Maybe they make more money on these other releases the stuff is easier to mass produce and they can use it to expand their market, but, they don't do because they lose money.
Craig wrote:BakaGaijin wrote:True....but the argument was that these releases don't make money....but they do.
Bellwoods does a ton of such releases a year and Nickel Brook did something like 40 000 bottles of Kentucky Bastard I think ($640 000 revenue).
There is no reason why Amsterdam can't do these barrel aged beers and do it at a profit IMO. I think the original question was why don't they do them anymore. Maybe they make more money on these other releases the stuff is easier to mass produce and they can use it to expand their market, but, they don't do because they lose money.
The argument isn't that you can't make money, it's that you make more money doing other stuff.
portwood wrote:BakaGaijin wrote:True....but the argument was that these releases don't make money....but they do.
...something like 40 000 bottles of Kentucky Bastard I think ($640 000 revenue).
You're making a valid point but your math is way off.
40,000 x $16 = $640,000 revenue for the LCBO, NOT the brewery
the revenue to NB is the price they sell to the 'BO.
Not to be forgotten are the customer returns (if any complaints for bad product), discounts taken to clear and any other shyte the 'BO charges back to the brewery which further reduce bottom line.
... same for brewery sales to the public out of the bottle shops: part of the sale price is comprised of various taxes. Therefore, the brewery does NOT record the full sell price as revenue.
midlife crisis wrote:Blasphomet wrote:God I sound like such a picky bastard here lately. Maybe just because I've been spoiling myself with 'brewery only' beer from all over and enjoying the hell out of it.
From Ontario, or elsewhere?
Blasphomet wrote:midlife crisis wrote:Blasphomet wrote:God I sound like such a picky bastard here lately. Maybe just because I've been spoiling myself with 'brewery only' beer from all over and enjoying the hell out of it.
From Ontario, or elsewhere?
Yeah just Ontario. Checking out the new guys like Common Good and Halo along with personal favourites like Burdock and Bellwoods... amongst the many others... and my local 5 Paddles.
Craig wrote:In fairness, the hoopla was never about the blonde or big wheel. It was about beers like (double) tempest, sour cherry IS and deWallen. They were making those 3-4 years ago when the styles were a lot rarer.
They also had interesting one off releases. Anyone remember Lady Stav and Goedenmorgen?
Craig wrote:BakaGaijin wrote:There is no reason why Amsterdam can't do these barrel aged beers and do it at a profit IMO.
The argument isn't that you can't make money, it's that you make more money doing other stuff.
TheSevenDuffs wrote:Exactly. I remember when Tempest was first released ... maybe Ontario's first ever bottled imperial stout? At that time, that was awesome! For a while, they were producing some very interesting beer at their former Bathurst Street location, albeit it many of them were extremely limited runs.
Belgian wrote:Teichert Smoked Porter was kind of a one-off. Haven't seen it in five years maybe?
Return to “LCBO, Beer Store and Grocery Stores”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests