Burton Porter

Bytowner · Post by **Bytowner** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:08 pm

Anyone else find this unpleasantly sour? Is that the sulphur in the Burton water or something else? Certainly not my favourite seasonal release of the year.

JesseM · Post by **JesseM** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:33 pm

I didn't even bother with this one this time. It sucked last year and I was frankly surprised and disappointed that it was included this year. If I recall correctly, it costs more than the Harvey's, right? Ridiculous.

Bobsy · Post by **Bobsy** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:43 pm

I'm with Jesse on this one after last year's experience. I think President Bush said it best:

"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

matt7215 · Post by **matt7215** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:57 am

i didnt buy this one either. i was dissapointed in it last year so i figured i wouldnt waste my money this year. im glad to see that i made the right choice.

Bytowner · Post by **Bytowner** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:05 pm

Huh, I guess I was the only one that missed it last year. Well, I know better for next year!

boney · Post by **boney** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:07 pm

Yeah, the Burton Porter is odd with a little sourness and the metalic notes, but I didn't think it was offensive by any means. Not the best of the fall releases, but cetainly not the worst. I actually thought the slight sourness (not the same kind of sourness as a skunky beer) complimented the slightly bitter finish. If anything, the unique flavour made me remember this from last year. I'd only really buy 1 per year, but I'd recommend it to someone who hadn't tried it just for something a little different.

sprague11 · Post by **sprague11** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:14 pm

I found the Burton very underwhelming. Of course, I'm used to Great Lakes Edmund Fitzgerald, which is outstanding.

Torontoblue · Post by **Torontoblue** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:51 pm

sprague11 wrote:I found the Burton very underwhelming. Of course, I'm used to Great Lakes Edmund Fitzgerald, which is outstanding.

I agree that the Burton isn't a great beer but the Great Lakes is a totally different style, so it's really Apples & Oranges to compare them. Wouldn't you say?

Let's keep this on topic eh

sprague11 · Post by **sprague11** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:39 pm

Torontoblue wrote:
sprague11 wrote:I found the Burton very underwhelming. Of course, I'm used to Great Lakes Edmund Fitzgerald, which is outstanding.
I agree that the Burton isn't a great beer but the Great Lakes is a totally different style, so it's really Apples & Oranges to compare them. Wouldn't you say? Let's keep this on topic eh

Hey, they both say "porter" on the bottle

Torontoblue · Post by **Torontoblue** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:50 pm

sprague11 wrote:
Torontoblue wrote:
sprague11 wrote:I found the Burton very underwhelming. Of course, I'm used to Great Lakes Edmund Fitzgerald, which is outstanding.
I agree that the Burton isn't a great beer but the Great Lakes is a totally different style, so it's really Apples & Oranges to compare them. Wouldn't you say? Let's keep this on topic eh
Hey, they both say "porter" on the bottle

And........................................?

Alexander Keith's says IPA.

sprague11 · Post by **sprague11** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:34 pm

Torontoblue wrote:
And........................................? Alexander Keith's says IPA.

Hey, Mr Keith was scared to death of hops! We can't help that!;)

Lets just agree that the Burton was not worth the money!

pootz · Post by **pootz** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:01 pm

Bytowner wrote:Anyone else find this unpleasantly sour? Is that the sulphur in the Burton water or something else? Certainly not my favourite seasonal release of the year.

It was a bottle conditioned ale that did not turn out well. Mine was slightly off and the other was a volcano when I opened it...took a pass this time.

Belgian · Post by **Belgian** » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:43 pm

TorontoBlue is calling the BS correctly- a so called 'style' of beer can have a drastic range, almost making the comparisons irrelevant..

I found the Burton this year (my particular bottle anyway!) quite unlike the green-apple-skin flavor I got last year - today's Burton is mushroom-y and earthy as if those green apples had been forgotten in a damp cellar.

Interesting but not quite likable.

Illuminatus · Post by **Illuminatus** » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:11 pm

Bobsy wrote:I think President Bush said it best

Huh. I didn't think those words would ever fit in that order.

Steve Beaumont · Post by **Steve Beaumont** » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:24 am

The Burton Porter is old school, the way porters used to be when tanks large enough to host a good-sized dinner party in were used to age them. (Really. The brewer Meux once had a tank that would hold 20,000 barrels of beer, and a vat at the Horse Show Brewery which ruptured in 1814 resulted in the reported deaths of 8 people!) The aging was necessary to impart to the beers a sourness reminiscent of the old ales, sometimes known as sour ales, which were an important part of the original blended porter known as three threads.

(I don't know how much of this Ron Pattinson has now debunked, probably a considerable amount, but the sourness is certainly true.)

The Burton unquestionably has had gushing issues in the past -- I haven't yet tried any of the new release -- but in terms of flavour alone, it's a bit of a taste of history. Which is not to say that you should like it, just that the sour flavour is less infection than intent.

The Bar Towel

Burton Porter

Burton Porter

Re: Burton Porter