Guybrush wrote:I agree that the Hallertau is the better of the two. But RB folk tell me I'm wrong, dead wrong.
Derek wrote:I'm somewhat curious to try these, but I imagine it's just their regular 'IPA' grist (corn syrup anyone?) with some different hops thrown in.
GregClow wrote:Derek wrote:I'm somewhat curious to try these, but I imagine it's just their regular 'IPA' grist (corn syrup anyone?) with some different hops thrown in.
According to the press material, and the Keith's rep I spoke to at the launch, these are all-grain, all-malt beers. And they taste like it as well.
markaberrant wrote:matt7215 wrote:agreed, these arent world beaters but they are average examples of APAs, much better then regular Keiths
What would be a similar beer in terms of flavour and quality?
Derek wrote:I've mentioned it before, but I was never a big fan of Tankhouse. I always thought it had too much crystal malt sweetness. The cascade hopping was originally great, but it certainly diminished when they moved production from the brewpub. Tighter filtering? I don't know. My old neighbour actually had a Brew on Premise with Duggan decades ago (I think it was on Laird). In those days they used extract and steeped grains and essentially developed what became Tankhouse. Duggan makes some great beer, and I was a huge fan of his brewpub, but I think this one still seems like an old school homebrewing effort. Of course he's no longer responsible for that one... and the #9 was better.
markaberrant wrote:Great info, and I like your comparison to old school homebrew, but I'd also add in old school canadian craft beer... not much difference really, but I am surprised by how many Canadian craft brewers are still putting out mostly pedestrian/out of touch products... obviously it is still selling for them, but it shows how Canada is still quite a ways behind the US.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests