Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.
We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.
Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!
We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.
Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!
BA switches to A-F ratings, no + or -
BA switches to A-F ratings, no + or -
Source: http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read/4291329
I think this was a bad move. BA and Ratebeer are a big deal; they generate lots of hype and are an important forum for exploring new beers. The community has been rating beer according to their system for years now. I know they haven't changed numbers, but I'm sure lots of people rate with letter grades in mind. You shouldn't just retroactively alter the ratings of thousands of people.
Maybe worse than that, the categories are now so broad so as to be meaningless. Sculpin IPA, Red Racer IPA, Fat Tug are now solidly in the same category as Hop Circle (no offense to Philips, but really).
So many things on that site scream of pointless elitism. E.g. the fact that the Alström Bros make their personal reviews so visible.
I think this was a bad move. BA and Ratebeer are a big deal; they generate lots of hype and are an important forum for exploring new beers. The community has been rating beer according to their system for years now. I know they haven't changed numbers, but I'm sure lots of people rate with letter grades in mind. You shouldn't just retroactively alter the ratings of thousands of people.
Maybe worse than that, the categories are now so broad so as to be meaningless. Sculpin IPA, Red Racer IPA, Fat Tug are now solidly in the same category as Hop Circle (no offense to Philips, but really).
So many things on that site scream of pointless elitism. E.g. the fact that the Alström Bros make their personal reviews so visible.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:13 pm
That 'B' range is way too big... a majority of the brews would fit in there!
They've reviewed the comments and locked down the thread... so hopefully they make some improvement.Score rAvg Range
A 4.50-5.00 awesome must try
B 3.50-4.49 good / above average try it
C 2.50-3.49 average
D 2.00-2.49 poor / below average avoid
F 1.00-1.99 fail
- markaberrant
- Seasoned Drinker
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:28 pm
- Location: Regina, SK
- cratez
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:29 pm
- Location: Brantford, Ontario
- Contact:
They'll probably revert to the old system and simply tweak the numerical parameters of the letter grades so that high ratings are rarer, C equates to "decent" rather than "mediocre," and so on. The +/- classifications have always been a defining feature of BA and a major reason as to why I prefer it over other rating sites. Also, considering the Bros still write reviews for the magazine, I can't see them completely abandoning the old rating scale (or a variation of it). But we'll see what happens...Derek wrote: They've reviewed the comments and locked down the thread...so hopefully they make some improvement.
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2584
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 3:40 pm
- Location: Mississauga
- Contact:
I hate these changes. They are such a fundamental shift in the ratings. I can't believe that they even considered this. Sometimes I wonder about the decisions that the Alstrom brothers make. I have been on BA for a while now (instead of RB) but things like this really make me wonder why.
I don't see how this change benefits anyone.
I don't see how this change benefits anyone.
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2584
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 3:40 pm
- Location: Mississauga
- Contact:
I think the Alstrom brothers have lost their way. I wonder if these guys are even impartial anymore. Every month that I get my BA magazine I wonder why they never seen to give any beer below a C+ rating. Some seriously terrible stuff is reviewed (like 3 different Keith's beers in a recent edition) and you never see a terrible review from them. Makes me wonder...
BA's relevancy declines the more the Alstrom brothers tinker with the site. They'd be better off keeping a bit of distance and let it run themselves. Either that or BA needs an Arab Spring.
It also seems to personality heavy. Frankly I don't give a shit what they think of a beer, and some of their forum posts have portrayed them in a less than favourable light. I understand it's their site and I can choose whether to use it or not, which is a reason I chose to leave as an active user despite being one of the top 100 reviewers.
It also seems to personality heavy. Frankly I don't give a shit what they think of a beer, and some of their forum posts have portrayed them in a less than favourable light. I understand it's their site and I can choose whether to use it or not, which is a reason I chose to leave as an active user despite being one of the top 100 reviewers.
I don't really use BA except to check in on the forums now and again, but I can't see how a rating system that is less refined is going to be better...
I have always liked the overall site interface better at Ratebeer. Other people say the opposite (which I find strange), so to each their own right?
I have always liked the overall site interface better at Ratebeer. Other people say the opposite (which I find strange), so to each their own right?
Here's the RateBeer thread: http://www.ratebeer.com/forums/beer-adv ... 187949.htm
LOL, what a goofball move. I guess I understand the compulsion to keep things "simple, clean," but are those few pixels to the right of the letter grade hurting your user experience that much?
Personally, I'd "advocate" switching over to RB. These things always work better when you've got critical mass, and even though RB's rating system isn't perfect, perhaps you could influence its direction. There are obviously some thoughtful users on BA, but they're being railroaded by a needlessly oversimplified approach.
You can also spare yourself the indignity of seeing "THE BROS: A (awesome)" at the top of listings. What is this, some kind of frat?
LOL, what a goofball move. I guess I understand the compulsion to keep things "simple, clean," but are those few pixels to the right of the letter grade hurting your user experience that much?
Personally, I'd "advocate" switching over to RB. These things always work better when you've got critical mass, and even though RB's rating system isn't perfect, perhaps you could influence its direction. There are obviously some thoughtful users on BA, but they're being railroaded by a needlessly oversimplified approach.
You can also spare yourself the indignity of seeing "THE BROS: A (awesome)" at the top of listings. What is this, some kind of frat?
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2584
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 3:40 pm
- Location: Mississauga
- Contact:
I am part of that other category. To be honest, I have never even taken the time to understand RB's ratings. It seems like any decent beer is rated between 96 and 100 overall and style. Are those reference points even meaningful or do RB users just focus on the average score out of 5?JerCraigs wrote:I don't really use BA except to check in on the forums now and again, but I can't see how a rating system that is less refined is going to be better...
I have always liked the overall site interface better at Ratebeer. Other people say the opposite (which I find strange), so to each their own right?
- saints_gambit
- Bar Fly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 2:38 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Contact: