Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.
We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.
Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!
We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.
Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!
General LCBO Debate & Discussion Thread
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:00 pm
- Location: Toronto
That's a bit unfair. The question "should government be in the business of retailing beer and wine to the exclusion of private vendors?" is an ideological one, whether you think the answer is yes or no.This is just it. When asked why he'd sell off a company that pulls in 2 billion dollars, he just says he's opposed to government running businesses. He'd sacrifice it on the basis of pure ideology.
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:39 am
- Location: Brampton, ON
Sure. And I would agree that holding onto a crown corporation even when it doesn't make money is also ideological, and not based good fiscal policy.
But Hudak's argument isn't: "the LCBO is dragging us down, and it's not profitable for the province to run it any more", but rather, "I don't think it's the government's business to run businesses." That's based on an idea, rather than financial policy.
I'm an unabashed NDP member, but I'm quite open to opening up competition. Clearly, the model we've had since 1927 is a out of date, but I'm not sure about selling the whole thing off.
He seems to think, though, that we won't lose any revenue from it, that we'll make up for it in taxes and not having to pay employees. It's possible, and I'm not great with numbers, but it doesn't sound convincing.
Also important to note that he seemed to soften his message later in the day, saying that he'd like to explore a range of options from selling part of it, to simply opening up competition.
But Hudak's argument isn't: "the LCBO is dragging us down, and it's not profitable for the province to run it any more", but rather, "I don't think it's the government's business to run businesses." That's based on an idea, rather than financial policy.
I'm an unabashed NDP member, but I'm quite open to opening up competition. Clearly, the model we've had since 1927 is a out of date, but I'm not sure about selling the whole thing off.
He seems to think, though, that we won't lose any revenue from it, that we'll make up for it in taxes and not having to pay employees. It's possible, and I'm not great with numbers, but it doesn't sound convincing.
Also important to note that he seemed to soften his message later in the day, saying that he'd like to explore a range of options from selling part of it, to simply opening up competition.
"What can you say about Pabst Blue Ribbon that Dennis Hopper hasn’t screamed in the middle of an ether binge?" - Jordan St. John
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:39 am
- Location: Brampton, ON
Article from the Star:
Yeah, it's by someone from the CCPA, so kind of biased, and this a little too much "social responsibility" stuff in the second half, but the first part makes some interesting points.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editoria ... lyzer-test
Yeah, it's by someone from the CCPA, so kind of biased, and this a little too much "social responsibility" stuff in the second half, but the first part makes some interesting points.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editoria ... lyzer-test
"What can you say about Pabst Blue Ribbon that Dennis Hopper hasn’t screamed in the middle of an ether binge?" - Jordan St. John
-
- Bar Fly
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 9:25 am
- Location: Ottawa
-
- Beer Superstar
- Posts: 2552
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:39 am
- Location: Brampton, ON
Yeah, and "social responsibility" in and of itself doesn't have to be a bad thing. There's a difference between thinking a skull bottle is too offensive or explosive beer packaging, and making sure 13 year olds or drunk guys in cars don't buy booze.Kel Varnsen wrote: Except I totally get the feeling that if they start selling Vodka at 7-11 people are going to freak out.
"What can you say about Pabst Blue Ribbon that Dennis Hopper hasn’t screamed in the middle of an ether binge?" - Jordan St. John
I find it WAY easier to buy booze in Ontario than, for instance, Buffalo. The only time I get carded at the LCBO is when there's a new employee or hovering manager. I don't think I've ever bought beer in Buffalo and not been carded (sometimes multiple pieces of ID) - including at bars, which I don't think has ever happened to me in Ontario. Our system ≠ social responsibility.JeffPorter wrote:Yeah, and "social responsibility" in and of itself doesn't have to be a bad thing. There's a difference between thinking a skull bottle is too offensive or explosive beer packaging, and making sure 13 year olds or drunk guys in cars don't buy booze.Kel Varnsen wrote: Except I totally get the feeling that if they start selling Vodka at 7-11 people are going to freak out.
A shark on whisky is mighty risky. A shark on beer is a beer engineer.
- saints_gambit
- Bar Fly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 2:38 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Contact:
The whole thing is a snare and a delusion.
The companies that own The Beer Store are the only ones with the money and will to make this happen and in order to do that, they would be giving up a state sponsored virtual monopoly.
What really needs to happen is that someone should consolidate all of the information on the topic into one place so that the next time this topic comes up, in six months, we can all just link to it and then get on with our lives.
The companies that own The Beer Store are the only ones with the money and will to make this happen and in order to do that, they would be giving up a state sponsored virtual monopoly.
What really needs to happen is that someone should consolidate all of the information on the topic into one place so that the next time this topic comes up, in six months, we can all just link to it and then get on with our lives.
saintjohnswort.ca
-
- Bar Fly
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 9:25 am
- Location: Ottawa
I would love to be a fly on a wall and here the Beer Store owners take on this. I mean on the one hand it is nice to have the government monopoly that you run. But on the other hand, selling their products through the beer store means that there are only 400 or so stores in Ontario that sell most of their products. And they have to own those stores and pay for thing like maintenance and employees. If beer was sold in grocery stores people could get their coors light in 1000's of stores, and it would be someone else paying for things like employees and that sort of thing.saints_gambit wrote: The companies that own The Beer Store are the only ones with the money and will to make this happen and in order to do that, they would be giving up a state sponsored virtual monopoly.
-
- Seasoned Drinker
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:22 am
- Location: Barrie, Ontario
I once tried buying cigarettes at a gas station in Syracuse. They refused to sell to me because every age controlled productsold had to be accompanied by a swipe of the magnetic stripe on the purchasers ID card. They couldn't swipe my Canadian ID, so they refused me service. I asked the cashier if they would ID an 80 year old man, and he said they ID everyone regardless of how old they look.Cale wrote:I find it WAY easier to buy booze in Ontario than, for instance, Buffalo. The only time I get carded at the LCBO is when there's a new employee or hovering manager. I don't think I've ever bought beer in Buffalo and not been carded (sometimes multiple pieces of ID) - including at bars, which I don't think has ever happened to me in Ontario. Our system ≠ social responsibility.JeffPorter wrote:Yeah, and "social responsibility" in and of itself doesn't have to be a bad thing. There's a difference between thinking a skull bottle is too offensive or explosive beer packaging, and making sure 13 year olds or drunk guys in cars don't buy booze.Kel Varnsen wrote: Except I totally get the feeling that if they start selling Vodka at 7-11 people are going to freak out.
I wish I could remember the name of the gas bar - it was part of a chain, and apparently this is a chain-wide policy.
- saints_gambit
- Bar Fly
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 2:38 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Contact:
Kel Varnsen wrote:I would love to be a fly on a wall and here the Beer Store owners take on this. I mean on the one hand it is nice to have the government monopoly that you run. But on the other hand, selling their products through the beer store means that there are only 400 or so stores in Ontario that sell most of their products. And they have to own those stores and pay for thing like maintenance and employees. If beer was sold in grocery stores people could get their coors light in 1000's of stores, and it would be someone else paying for things like employees and that sort of thing.saints_gambit wrote: The companies that own The Beer Store are the only ones with the money and will to make this happen and in order to do that, they would be giving up a state sponsored virtual monopoly.
You're not wrong that there might be advantages. The question is ultimately whether it would be worthwhile for them to attempt to enact those changes and take advantage of wider distribution at the cost of surrendering a monopoly. Given that The Beer Store has existed for 85 years and shows no sign of ceasing to exist, we also have the answer to that question.
saintjohnswort.ca
I mean they don't care about making MORE money than they already do by being far more efficient and consumer-oriented. They ARE wasteful and discard the opportunity to make still-greater profits which would fund the province. This is because they can afford to, and there's no competiton.JeffPorter wrote:I'm not sure how they operate at a loss when net income was 1.56 billion in 2010, and has been increasing steadily for 17 years. Unless there's something I'm not getting.Belgian wrote: It's milking the cow at a loss rather than innovating for more profits which the LC doesn't really care about.
'Milking the Cow' is entirely accurate & the stategy of weak 'play it safe' business that resists innovation.
In Beerum Veritas
50/50 chance I would imagine - or at least they would transfer stock around. my brother got amny things transferred to Sault Ste Marie LCBO's when he lived there.spinrsx wrote:anyone know?
spinrsx wrote:If I ask my local LCBO to start carrying certain beers, any chance they will? Who picks what's on the shelves? The manger? Do they listen to suggestions?
"A good light beer is one that doesn't taste like piss!" - Frank d'Angelo