FEUO wrote:JerCraigs wrote:
Untapped is doing well because there a lot more people out there with smartphones willing to quickly check in to a beer than there are people who want to sit and analyze a beer like RB or BA raters do. To each their own.
In all fairness, I gave up reading RB and BA reviews a few years ago as I found most to be full of sh*t. Tastes are subjective. As are ratings. Take an average number for a beer with a grain of salt and judge for yourself. More often than not when I try a beer that is rated highly I am disappointed.
Of course tastes are subjective. That isn't going to change based on whether you read reviews on RB/BA, Untapped, or any other ratings platform. Learning how to calibrate a given ratings system/forum/whatever with your personal tastes is the hard part. A decent rating will tell the reader enough information about what is there, and what the rater thought of it and the reader can form an opinion based on that and what they know about their own tastes. Generally the more information provided the more helpful it is for users.
FEUO wrote:
So you are concluding that because some have smartphones and utilize them they do not sit and analyze/appreciate their beer?
I didn't say that. I said more/most Untapped users don;t analyze beer
in the same way as people writing longer ratings do. Also analyze does not equate to appreciation.
A Venn diagram of ALL beer lovers is complicated but I don't think it is remotely a controversial statement to say that they would rank in numbers more to less
(very roughly) like this:
People who like to drink beer
People who like to try many new beers
People who like to track the new beers they try somehow
People who like to go on the internet to talk about beer
People who like to rate the new beers they try somehow
People who like to "long form" rate the new beers they try somehow
People who like to go on the internet to talk about rating beer
People who like to go on the internet to nitpick and argue about how other people are rating beer.
