Page 13 of 14
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:45 pm
by dale cannon
JeffPorter wrote:So it isn't like there's two different sets of 4-packs...some packs have different bottles from, what, different batches? Seems kind of weird...
Read my post from this morning again carefully.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:03 pm
by atomeyes
dale cannon wrote:JeffPorter wrote:So it isn't like there's two different sets of 4-packs...some packs have different bottles from, what, different batches? Seems kind of weird...
Read my post from this morning again carefully.
i've read 2 of your posts carefully and have determined that you're a total jerknose peebreath.
anything else you request of us?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:11 pm
by Torontoblue
dale cannon wrote:JeffPorter wrote:So it isn't like there's two different sets of 4-packs...some packs have different bottles from, what, different batches? Seems kind of weird...
Read my post from this morning again carefully.
Jeffporter mentions one of his bottles is without a bottling date, confirming there are 2 different bottling runs in this one shipment. You then tell him that the high sediment bottles are even older than his unmarked bottle; how do you know this? Or is there a 3rd mysterious batch within this order?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:21 pm
by SteelbackGuy
atomeyes wrote:dale cannon wrote:JeffPorter wrote:So it isn't like there's two different sets of 4-packs...some packs have different bottles from, what, different batches? Seems kind of weird...
Read my post from this morning again carefully.
i've read 2 of your posts carefully and have determined that you're a total jerknose peebreath.
anything else you request of us?
I might use that insult in the future.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:00 pm
by dale cannon
atomeyes wrote:i've read 2 of your posts carefully and have determined that you're a total jerknose peebreath.
anything else you request of us?
Just two requests for you atomeyes. Grow up, and don't make hasty assumptions about the intent of posts for which there can be multiple interpretations.
Jeff Porter, I can assure you, I wasn't trying to be condescending.
TorontoBlue, based on the link I posted from Green Flash, we can see that there are at least 2 batches of their IPA in LCBO circulation. Based on posts in this thread, and from what I've seen myself, there
could possibly be more than 2 batches out there:
1. Bottles with May 21 2012 bottling date (still somewhat hoppy, slight sediment)
2. Bottles with no bottling date (like Jeff Porter's, i.e. slight sediment)
3. Bottles with no bottling date (like Jeff Rubin's picture, i.e. heavy sediment and negligible hop aroma/flavour)
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:12 pm
by heebes
its sad that the 3 parties involved (Green Flash, North American Craft, LCBO) in bringing this beer here dont seem to care whatsoever about the quality of the product
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 3:38 pm
by atomeyes
dale cannon wrote:
Just two requests for you atomeyes. Grow up, and don't make hasty assumptions about the intent of posts for which there can be multiple interpretations.
done and done. literally.
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:56 pm
by robinvboyer
Some finally made it up to North Bay. Can't find a bottling date, ery slight sediment, and still quite hoppy. Nowhere near what I know it can be but still quite nice. Actually reminds me alot of Mad Tom in the shape this 4 pack is in.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:47 pm
by spinrsx
weird, there were 32 4-packs left at one of the Ottawa locations yesterday, and today the system says they're gone. Wonder if one of the local bars stocked up on 5 month old IPA.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:43 pm
by Belgian
There's a
massive quantity at Market Square, anyone know if a repeat shipment of fresh stock has been / will be made?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:56 pm
by spinrsx
NAC says "we have to make changes to the Label and are in the process of doing so. We should have some more in time for the holiday season. Cheers!"
wonder what's wrong with the label.. maybe this is what caused the delay in releasing it in the first place?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:09 pm
by Torontoblue
The label as is doesn't conform to CFIA standards. All the agency have to do is arrange for a strip label to be attached to the bottle, or 4 pack if the bottles aren't for sale individually.
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:06 pm
by Brewbert
I don't know what genius thought it would be good to bring in 5 month old (And possibly older for unmarked..) IPA.
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:21 pm
by saints_gambit
Brewbert wrote:I don't know what genius thought it would be good to bring in 5 month old (And possibly older for unmarked..) IPA.
I think it's a brand with enough credibility that should a second round of bottles come in with a more recent packaging date on it, we beer nerds will forgive the growing pains.
Plus, having one anchor brand makes it more likely we'll get Le Freak or Palate Wrecker as a seasonal.
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 2:31 pm
by Hawks28
PRODUCT DISCONTINUED*
seriously? just like that? thats gotta be a mistake right?
http://lcbo.com/lcbo-ear/lcbo/product/s ... anguage=EN