Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:53 pm
by old faithful
I just tried mine and the spice mixture is great and very well balanced. I'd have preferred the beer to be a little sweeter, however. Certainly it will please those who like a dryish taste in beer. I tend to like the malty side of the equation. I blended mine 2:1 Pumpkin to Iron Duke and it brought it into perfect balance for me.
Gary
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:30 pm
by Derek
When I think "pumpkin pie", I think sweet as well.
I did like the Great Lakes though. I thought the Grand River and Perry's Pumpkin were even drier (and more bitter). Both well-crafted, drinkable & interesting... just not inline with my preconceived notions.
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:51 am
by A
Just wondering Gary - do you ever decide to drink a beer as it was meant to be had, or are you always concocting your own blends? From your posts here it sounds like the latter.....
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:25 pm
by Belgian
A wrote:Just wondering Gary - do you ever decide to drink a beer as it was meant to be had, or are you always concocting your own blends? From your posts here it sounds like the latter.....
Check OF's "Hockley Gold" thread, if (as an expert on OF's posts) you can manage to find that one.
Taking a shot at Gary every time is tedious, man. Sorry had to say it, because it sounds mean.
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:50 pm
by lister
A wrote:Just wondering Gary - do you ever decide to drink a beer as it was meant to be had
Yes, aside from the numerous postings here (Hockley Gold and GL Pumpkin are recent), I've seen him drink unaltered beer.
What's wrong with mixing anyways? A new more interesting concoction could be had or potentially a good one from two mediocre ones. If you're wanting product Z which doesn't exist or can't be easily had and products x+y=z (approximately), what's wrong with giving it a try?
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:27 pm
by jethro796
Just got back from the brwery and they have 10 bottles left in their cooler - as well as their winter ale in 750ml bottles.
cheers
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:27 pm
by pootz
lister wrote:
What's wrong with mixing anyways? A new more interesting concoction could be had or potentially a good one from two mediocre ones.
Not a thing...this is how Porter evolved.
Better craft/micro bars usually have a house black and tan mixture and many will mix anything you want.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:43 pm
by Ale's What Cures Ya
I found Grand River's Highballer to be much more appealing.
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:06 pm
by Belgian
lister wrote:
What's wrong with mixing anyways? A new more interesting concoction could be had or potentially a good one from two mediocre ones. If you're wanting product Z which doesn't exist or can't be easily had and products x+y=z (approximately), what's wrong with giving it a try?
Always how I have thought about the whole thing. Why get huffy over something that doesn't matter.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:58 pm
by Blankboy
Belgian wrote:Taking a shot at Gary every time is tedious, man. Sorry had to say it, because it sounds mean.
You know what else is tedious? In every thread about a beer, Old Faithful has to post his "concoctions". Maybe he can start a "Gary's Wacky Concoctions" thread so I don't have to read them.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:06 pm
by lagerale
DragonOfBlood wrote:I found Grand River's Highballer to be much more appealing.
Had this at beerbistro the other week and couldn't believe how well it went down. I have't tried any of the other local pumpkin beers, but if they are comparable or better, I better get my hands on some.
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:01 am
by lister
Blankboy wrote:You know what else is tedious? In every thread about a beer, Old Faithful has to post his "concoctions". Maybe he can start a "Gary's Wacky Concoctions" thread so I don't have to read them.
What's tedious is your pissy negative attitude.
You could just stop reading his posts.
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:04 am
by Blankboy
lister wrote:Blankboy wrote:You know what else is tedious? In every thread about a beer, Old Faithful has to post his "concoctions". Maybe he can start a "Gary's Wacky Concoctions" thread so I don't have to read them.
What's tedious is your pissy negative attitude.
You could just stop reading his posts.
Or, you know, you could stop reading mine just as easily.
As for me not reading his posts, considering he posts in practically every thread on the forum that would be kind of difficult to do don't you think?
Also, I never said I didn't want to read his posts nor did I say I had any problems with Gary, all I said is it would be nice if I could read at least a few threads without running into "I mixed 1/4 Steamwhistle with 2/4 Hoogarden and 1/4 Guinness" all the time, it's getting old. So I suggested he start his own thread where he can post his concoctions to his heart's content, I can avoid that thread and then everybody is happy.
But I guess that's too "negative" for this forum.
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:18 am
by grub
bla bla bla. i'm sure everybody has somebody on here that they'd rather not read. no use in everyone going and sitting in their own little corner. how about we all get back to talking about beer rather than turning this into a pissing match?
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:28 am
by Blankboy
grub wrote:bla bla bla. i'm sure everybody has somebody on here that they'd rather not read. no use in everyone going and sitting in their own little corner. how about we all get back to talking about beer rather than turning this into a pissing match?
I'm sick of your pissy negative attitude!