That's a neat analogy, though not one that I agree with. I'd classify people like Elvis, The Police and Madonna as pop, but I'd hardly call them the equivalent of Estrella Damm, Laker and Whistler Export. There's lots of different types of pop music, so I think it would be fairer to compare it to lager styles in general rather than just shit lager. Maybe Whacko was more of a doppelbock?The_Jester wrote:Fair question.Jon Walker wrote:...Let me put it this way, what in your opinion disqualifies him as a "musical legend" other than your own dislike of his music?
I guess it's his genre. I believe that someone suggested earlier that pop music is the pale lager of the music world. Now, Jackson may have been, in his day, the finest pale lager out there. Maybe he is a "legendary" pale lager. But I'm not a big fan of pale lager, and although I'm sure there must be some good ones out there, I really don't know much about them. Because I'm not a fan of the style. And I don't think that the finest pale lager in the world stands up to even an above-average IPA, or tripel, or weizenbock. It's not supposed to.
Maybe you feel that this is an unfair analogy. I don't. Maybe it's just me. But, as with beer, once I learned to appreciate the finer points and subtleties of music that's not designed for mass consumption, I could no longer take pop music seriously.
As for people who do, I don't think any less of them (or more of myself) than I do of people who drink Laker. There are certainly as many of them out there. To each his, or her, own.
Perhaps it would be even better to compare pop to wine - anything too young is usually crap, but the vintages tend to be quite solid and worthy of a try.