Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.

We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.

Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!

The Grinch Who Stole Cascadia

Discuss beer or anything else that comes to mind in here.

Moderators: Craig, Cass

JeffPorter
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:39 am
Location: Brampton, ON

Post by JeffPorter »

cmadd wrote:
JerCraigs wrote:
JeffPorter wrote:So far in this, has or is Steamworks taken anyone to court, or is it just a matter of "cease and desists"?
I believe the main action so far has been a "shitstorm", to use the technical term :)
We have a shit-front moving through.



"You know what a shit rope is, Julian?"
"What can you say about Pabst Blue Ribbon that Dennis Hopper hasn’t screamed in the middle of an ether binge?" - Jordan St. John

User avatar
Belgian
Bar Towel Legend
Posts: 10033
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Earth

Post by Belgian »

JasonTremblay wrote:Dear lord ...

If the angry intertubes mob were so certain that the trademark is bunk, why don't they crowdsource some $$$ and hire a trademark lawyer to get the name expunged?

Oh yeah, they aren't so POed that they'd put up their own money.
It's probably cheaper and more effective to make the target hateful scum, IF that party in question are really truly being hateful scum. It can really hurt sales.

Don't underestimate the tar-and-feather mob response. Ideas are viral and can be more powerful than advertising or legal jousting. (Note the Larry DiMarzio example I mentioned earlier.)
In Beerum Veritas

midlife crisis
Beer Superstar
Posts: 2010
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by midlife crisis »

The problem, I think, was a failure to fully understand the beer industry by the trademark examiner who originally granted the marks. Trademarks cannot be granted if they are "merely descriptive". What most on the forum seem to be arguing is that the terms "nitro" and "Cascadian" are descriptive of beer styles. If that is the case, they should not be capable of being trademarked, just like you couldn't trademark "best bitter" or "porter". But was "Cascadian" an actual beer style at the time the mark was granted, or has that evolved only recently?

JasonTremblay
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:18 am

Post by JasonTremblay »

midlife crisis wrote: But was "Cascadian" an actual beer style at the time the mark was granted, or has that evolved only recently?
The original trademark application dates from 1999 -- it was approved a few years ago.

"Cascadian dark ale", as a style name, was largely introduced to the world via this BYO article from July / August 2010, https://www.byo.com/stories/beer-styles ... n-dark-ale . Earlier usage of the phrase is VERY limited, and seems to be dated no earlier than late 2009, with a more formal usage dating to a beer tasting in late January, 2010.

A handful of dark, hoppy beers have been introduced over the last 20 years, but there was no particular style attached to them. Rather, the beers were largely called "dark / brown and hoppy."

Google news has a few instances of "Cascadian hops" from the last few years, but the term has never gained traction.

Again, as Jordan said, Steamworks seems to have fallen ass-backwards into this.

FWIW, I think there's a lesson to be had in this tempest in a pint glass: if you're going to come up for a name for a new style, it should either be descriptive (American-Style India Black Ale) or cleared (via 5 minutes' worth of searching) for trademark infringement.

Jason

User avatar
Derek
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: Kelowna, BC
Contact:

Post by Derek »

JasonTremblay wrote: FWIW, I think there's a lesson to be had in this tempest in a pint glass: if you're going to come up for a name for a new style, it should either be descriptive (American-Style India Black Ale) or cleared (via 5 minutes' worth of searching) for trademark infringement.
Jason
Unfortunately the Americans probably didn't check, or care about, any Canadian trademarks.

Philips and other brewers probably should have... but I'd argue that it is now recognized as a legitimate style, and consumers should not be confused. Steamworks had NEVER sold ANY of their brews outside their pub.

If you make the use it or loose it argument, I'd say they already lost it.

Every brewer in Canada ought to make a Cascadian Dark Ale and name it accordingly. There's no way Steamworks could enforce their trademark for a few small batches they brewed YEARS ago.

User avatar
cmadd
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:00 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Post by cmadd »

The fun continues this week with Storm Brewing's Cease and Desist Cascadian Dark Ale that will be served on cask at the Whip restaurant in Vancouver!

User avatar
Derek
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3192
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: Kelowna, BC
Contact:

Post by Derek »

The "Nitro" issue was just settled...
http://blogs.westword.com/cafesociety/2 ... es_two.php

Post Reply