Looking for the original Bar Towel blog? You can find it at www.thebartowel.com.

We have a trivia question in order to register to prevent bots. If you have any issues with answering, contact us at cass@bartowel.com for help.

Introducing Light Mode! If you would like a Bar Towel social experience that isn't the traditional blue, you can now select Light Mode. Go to the User Control Panel and then Board Preferences, and select "Day Drinking" (Light Mode) from the My Board Style drop-down menu. You can always switch back to "Night Drinking" (Dark Mode). Enjoy!

Mill Street in the news ...

Discuss beer or anything else that comes to mind in here.

Moderators: Craig, Cass

User avatar
Mississauga Matt
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by Mississauga Matt »

And The Bar Towel comes desparately close to being mentioned. But not quite.

See http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Conten ... 0599119419

I don't know about you, but I highly regard the beer opinions of business writers. This one doesn't disappoint; she has a thing for Rolling Rock and cutesy bottles.

Kent
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Hamilton

Post by Kent »

The part about the "naked jump in a cold lake" has me worried.

User avatar
JerCraigs
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3063
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by JerCraigs »

It was a fluff piece but as fluff pieces go it wasn't bad. The first two paragraphs seemed a bit odd... space filler maybe? short a few words?

User avatar
joey_capps
Bar Fly
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Waterdown

Post by joey_capps »


and the reaction he has suffered from beer heads[/i] to Mill Street's introduction of an organic beer in 195 ml "pony" or "split" bottles. [my empasis]


Is this some insider industry term? Are we the "beer heads"? What get's me is that it was really one here person who criticized them.

Joe

User avatar
Cass
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3868
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Post by Cass »

This is a funny article. I feel like stirring things up today....

First off, if we are thought of as be the "beer world" or "beer heads", then I'm flattered, good or bad.

Secondly, I'm continually amazed at how that experience with the Bar Towel continues to pop up. I've spoken with the Mill St. guys about it in person a number of times, and it seemed to be eluded to in the article as well.

Which leads me to a theory: that Mill St. purposely plays up this self-depracating notion of their Organic Lager, which makes for good PR and articles like this one. It almost seems like they want to be seen as "us against the world" with regards to their lager.

What is surprisingly absent is significant mention of their other beers. Obviously they are trying to promote their lager, but from the very same "beer world" and "beer heads" they are getting almost unanimous praise for their specialty line. Is it not newsworthy when everyone loves it?

burgermeister
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Mississauga
Contact:

Post by burgermeister »

On 2003-08-04 10:04, Cass wrote:

Which leads me to a theory: that Mill St. purposely plays up this self-depracating notion of their Organic Lager, which makes for good PR and articles like this one. It almost seems like they want to be seen as "us against the world" with regards to their lager.
Successfully getting a beer noticed by the general population in Ontario is all about marketing and only minimally about the beer itself. I'm personally not a fan of the organic lager, I found it very bland on the first taste from the tap at the brewery. However, they've done a great job getting noticed, without having to spend marketing dollars - from writeups in the LCBO mag, Toronto Life, now this article in the star - and they all focus on the bottle and the word "organic". I think they've struck upon a pretty good marketing gimmic. Will have to wait and see how long it lasts.

Josh Oakes
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 8:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Josh Oakes »

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Only beer writers should be allowed to write about beer. My worst column makes this look like it was written by a cat. She took an entire article to make what, one point? Bloody hell.

burgermeister
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Mississauga
Contact:

Post by burgermeister »

On 2003-08-05 10:23, Josh Oakes wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Only beer writers should be allowed to write about beer...
Your right of course if the writer in question has an intended audience of people who truly enjoy good beer. The vast majority of people in this province/city don't fall into this category. They tend to read this kind of drivel - expecially when it's on the front page of the business section - and think they've discovered something incredible.

If you're a small brewer and you want to get noticed in this city/province, sure, get the beer writer's to notice you, but you've got to get the low brow writer's like this one to say something - anything - good about you.

User avatar
JerCraigs
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3063
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by JerCraigs »

While not pulitzer material, a quick perusal of some of her other articles indicates that the Mill St. article was not one of her best. Perhaps one too many Mill St. products were tested for quality prior to writing? :smile:

Josh Oakes
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 8:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Josh Oakes »

I don't buy that any publicity is good. There is nothing in this article that furthers the cause of good beer. I'm not interested in furthering the cause of mediocre beer. I don't believe in "stepping stone" beers or any other "wanna-be macro but produced on a micro scale" type of nonsense. The beer this article is about is Coors Light in a funny bottle. Furthermore, the writer is raving about Rolling Rock and crap like that. Utter gibberish.

As a business writer, she should have spent more time talking about the business than making evaluations about beers. Somebody did this with Steamwhistle a while back, too, and all it promotes is the notion that the only thing that matters with regards to beer is the promotion; and that the product itself is inconsequential. And as an article about promoting beer, I would have reservations allowing a first-year marketing student to pass the course if this was the best they could come up with.

burgermeister
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Mississauga
Contact:

Post by burgermeister »

On 2003-08-05 13:17, Josh Oakes wrote:
I don't buy that any publicity is good....
Good points, and I agree with your thinking. My point was more along the lines of understanding who your target audience is - whether your writing or making beer. The writer was obviously not targetting the beer lover (not sure who she was actually targetting, but that's another issue). Folks like Mill Street and Steam Whistle have been getting a fair bit of press thru these types of articles which is getting them noticed in some segments of the market. Tells me a little anyway about who they are actually targetting to expand their market position.

Josh Oakes
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 8:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Josh Oakes »

Another abysmal article from the mainstream press. Warning: you may throw your computer through the window before you're finished with this one.

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/215/t ... ste+.shtml

dhurtubise
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2001 7:00 pm

Post by dhurtubise »

Josh, what did you find so objectionable about that article?

I found it to echo my experience in Belgium this summer: From the description of Cantillon's masterbrewer (I guess he says the same thing to each of his visitors), to the historical sites, to the way the monks tend to interact with the public. I found it quite enjoyable, and accurate of what you can expect from a beer flavoured trip to Belgium.

esprit
Seasoned Drinker
Posts: 1677
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Esprit Agencies-Toronto

Post by esprit »

Josh...same comment, the article wasn't remotely offensive and actually quite enjoyable...having a bad day?

User avatar
JerCraigs
Beer Superstar
Posts: 3063
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by JerCraigs »

Having read the article I can see what Josh might have taken issue with in the article, (a couple of inaccuracies, and whats with the Cantillon quote about there being only six beers in Belgium he'd drink?!?) but from an authour who reveals in the last paragraph that she is a beer hater, it was a decent article. I would be interested to hear the same trip from her son's perspective.

Post Reply